How can non-conforming uses be categorized?

Non-conforming uses are typically categorized based on their legality and compliance with current zoning laws. The distinction between legal and illegal non-conforming uses is essential because it determines how these uses can be treated under the law.

A legal non-conforming use refers to a use of land or a structure that was established in compliance with the zoning regulations at the time it was created but no longer conforms to current zoning laws due to changes in those laws. This type typically has protections that allow it to continue operating despite not conforming to the current zoning regulations.

In contrast, an illegal non-conforming use is one that was established without following the necessary legal channels or does not comply with the zoning laws in effect at any time. Such uses typically do not have the same protections and may be subject to enforcement actions or require cessation as they do not have any legal basis to continue.

While other options mention concepts such as variance and grandfathering, which relate to the legal framework surrounding zoning and land use, they do not adequately capture the fundamental classification based on legality that is crucial for understanding how non-conforming uses operate within municipal regulation. This nuanced understanding of the legality of the uses helps city planners and code enforcement officials address non-conforming uses appropriately and ensures compliance with