In what year did the US Supreme Court case Euclid vs Amber Realty concern the constitutionality of zoning?

The United States Supreme Court case Euclid v. Amber Realty Co. was decided in 1926 and is significant in the history of land-use regulation and zoning law. This landmark case upheld the constitutionality of zoning ordinances, affirming that local governments have the authority to regulate land use in ways that promote the general welfare, such as reducing congestion, preserving property values, and providing for public health and safety.

In this case, the Village of Euclid, Ohio, adopted a zoning ordinance that divided the community into different zones for residential, commercial, and industrial uses. Amber Realty challenged the ordinance, arguing that it was arbitrary and violated their property rights under the 14th Amendment. However, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Euclid, establishing a legal precedent that zoning regulations are a valid exercise of the police power of the state and do not inherently violate constitutional rights.

The resolution in 1926 solidified the concept that zoning can be used as a tool for community planning and land use management. Understanding the timing and implications of this case is crucial for those studying Texas Code Enforcement, as it laid the foundation for modern zoning practices across the United States. The other years listed relate to different legal decisions or developments but are not associated with Eu