Which statement best describes a general law city?

A general law city is one that operates primarily under state law, and it is restricted by the provisions set forth in those laws. This means that such cities do not have the same level of autonomy as home rule cities, which can create their own ordinances and are governed by a charter that may grant broader authority. General law cities follow the laws of the state closely, with limited ability to create their own regulations.

The context of option B is that it highlights the operational framework of a general law city, emphasizing that these cities function under the constraints of state legislation. Cities classified in this manner primarily adhere to statutory guidelines with few deviations, ensuring that any governance aligns with the laws established by the state legislature.

In contrast, the other options suggest more autonomy or different governance structures—such as the ability to independently govern or to have a constitution-like charter, which are characteristics more aligned with home rule cities. Therefore, option B accurately encapsulates the nature of general law cities by focusing on their reliance on state law.